Back to the magazine2021 year №3

The Motif of the Lost Paradise in the Narrations about the Forced Displacement

Read the postRead the postDownload the post
The authors of the publication:
Koval-Fuchylo Iryna
p.:
87–97
UDC:
801.81:398.2]:314.15.045
Bibliographic description:
Koval-Fuchylo, I. (2021) The Motif of the Lost Paradise in the Narrations about the Forced Displacement. Folk Art and Ethnology, 2 (390), 87–97.

Author

Koval-Fuchylo Iryna

a Ph.D. in Philology, a senior research fellow at the Department of Ukrainian and Foreign Folkloristics of the NASU M. Rylskyi Institute for Art Studies, Folkloristics and Ethnology

 

The Motif of the Lost Paradise in the Narrations about the Forced Displacement

 

Abstract

A typical motif in the reminiscences on the forced resettlement caused by various factors is the description of a place that has to be left out. It acquires perfect features, the image of the lost paradise in the narrations. The idealization is the most often reflected in the descriptions of beautiful landscapes, rich natural resources, successful management, especially friendly community, as well as in the conscious, and more often unconscious hushing up or depreciation of the negative memories about the lost place. The same trends can be seen in the stories about the other forced migrants. In particular Ukrainians, displaced during the so-called ‘Vistula’ Operation. They begin their stories with the idealized descriptions of their native village. The use of binary opposition, at the poles of which there are two locations – a lost village and a forced settlement – contributes to the idealization. Often, such a construction is a poetic picture of an abandoned landscape as opposed to a plot that people have received in a displaced area. Numerous microtoponyms are considered as a typical feature in the description of a lost village. This variety of nomination never happens in the description of new settlements where there are almost no microtoponyms. In contrast, here we have the nominations with the semantics of non-existence, disorder: a huge nobody’s field, plots, allocated land.

An indirect form of lost paradise idealization is the constant declaration of the willingness to move again to the flooded space as soon as it is released.

Today various forms of social activity have become widespread for the purpose of memorializing flooded villages: annual meetings of displaced persons, publication of books about displaced settlements, opening of memorial signs near the reservoirs. The stories about such meetings have become a typical motif in memories of relocation. Obligatory components in displaced person’s meetings are common meal, singing, memories about a flooded village and making pictures. The mutual friendliness between the former villagers is emphasized in the reminiscences.

Another new original social activity is the annual competition called The Heat Roaring Dnipro. The participants have to overcome the three-kilometer distance between the two coasts of the Kaniv Reservoir with free swimming style. The first such event has taken place in 2016. In 2019 the fourth such round has happened.

We can suppose that such public initiatives are caused by the need to see former villagers, and the fact that people have the financial possibility to fulfill this necessity.

 

Keywords

oral history, migration, flooded territory, motive ‘the lost paradise’, idealization.

 

References

  1. BOSA, Liubov. Changes in the Landscape of the Dnipro in the 20th Century as a Socio-Cultural Problem. Folk Art and Ethnology, 2012, 4, 53–64 [in Ukrainian].
  2. HRINCHENKO, Helinada, Viktoriya NAUMENKO, Svitlana TELUKHA, eds. Vilcha is a Resettled Village. Kharkiv: ‘Drukarnia Madryd’, 2018, 188 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  3. HRYTSENKO, Pavlo, editor-in-chief. Chornobyl Zone Dialects. Texts. Kyiv: Dovira, 1996, 358 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  4. HORBOVYI, Oleh. Flooded Dnipro Lands: the Places of Memory and Museum Expositions (the 20th – Early 21st Century). PEREYASLAVIKA: Proceedings of the National Historical-Ethnographic Reserve ‘Pereyaslav’. Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi, 2018, 14 (16), 322–331 [in Ukrainian].
  5. HORBOVYI, Oleh. The Problem of the Dnipro Rapids and the Dniprohes (1927–1932): an Adaptation Strategy. Proceedingsin Ukrainian History, 2015, 37, 95–102 [in Ukrainian].
  6. ZHVANKO, Liubov. Refugees of the World War I: Ukrainian Dimension (1914–1918). Kharkiv, 2012, 568pp. [in Ukrainian].
  7. ZHVANKO, Liubov. Refugees of the World War I in Ukraine. Documents and Materials: a Monograph. Kharkiv, 2009, 360 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  8. MYKHNIAK, Mykola, compiler. Flooded Paradise: Andrushi in Reminiscences and Documents. Kyiv, 2018, 400 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  9. To Keep Memory. An Official Site of the Social Association ‘Old Dnipro’ [viewed February 29, 2020]. Available from: http://olddnieper.org.ua [in Ukrainian].
  10. IVASHCHENKO, Vitaliy. The Heat ‘Roaring Dnipro – 2019’. An Official Site of the Social Association ‘Old Dnipro’ [viewed February 29, 2020]. Available from: http://olddnieper.org.ua [in Ukrainian].
  11. IVASHCHENKO, Vitaliy. To Keep Memory on Flooded Villages. An Official Site of the Social Association ‘Old Dnipro’ [viewed February 29, 2020]. Available from: http://olddnieper.org.ua [in Ukrainian].
  12. KACHMAR, Mariya. Folk Stories on the Resettlement of Ukrainians from Zakerzonnia in the 1940s: Folklore and Historical Memory (After the Materials from the Village of Tulyholovy, Horodok District, Lviv Region). The Ethnology Notebooks, 2019, 4, 915–927 [in Ukrainian].
  13. KOVAL-FUCHILO, Irina. Immigrants’ Narrations from the Flood Zone with the Kremenchug Reservoir. The Living Past, 2014, 3, 38–40 [in Russian].
  14. KOVAL-FUCHYLO, Iryna. The ‘Land’ Concept in the Narrations on the Forced Displacement. Lemkovia, Bojkovia, Rusínidejiny, súčasnosť, materiálna a duchovná kultúra. Banská Bystrica, 2018, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 25–40 [in Ukrainian].
  15. KOVAL-FUCHYLO, Iryna. Comprehension of Forced Relocation from the Flood Zone with the Dniester Reservoir (Based on Oral History Narratives). TheSlavicWorld, 2014, 13, 215–231 [in Ukrainian].
  16. KUZMENKO, Oksana. DramaticExistence of the Person inUkrainianFolklore: ConceptualFormsofExpression (the Period of WorldWarIandWW II): a Monograph. Lviv, 2018, 728 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  17. KUZMENKO, Oksana. The MOTHERLAND Concept in the Paradigm of Temporal-Spatial Images in Folklore Neologisms on the Expulsion. Literature. Folklore. PoeticsProblems. Kyiv, 2010, 34, 210–219 [in Ukrainian].
  18. KUZMENKO-LISOVENKO, Kateryna. FloodedDniproCivilization. History. HumanDestinies. Kyiv, 2018, 264pp. [in Ukrainian].
  19. MYKHNIAK, Mykola, Serhiy ZUBER, eds. Now We Can See Pidsinne only in the Dreams. The Village in Reminiscences and Documents. Kyiv, 2019, 448 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  20. Scientific Editions. ‘Swallows do not Fly to Zarubyntsi’ [viewed on February 29, 2020]. Available from: http://m.oralhistory.webnode.com.ua/products/ne-letyat-lastivki-u-zarubintsi/ [in Ukrainian].
  21. HUK, Bohdan, ed. The Book of Remembrance. 1997, Warsaw, 647 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  22. SALO, Iryna, Levko STEK. Flooded Ukraine. 25 Cities and Villages under the Dnipro Waters. The Party has Decided so. Ukrainian Truth [viewed March 03, 2020]. Available from: http://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/2012/03/18/73460/ [in Ukrainian].
  23. SKRYPNYK, Hanna, editor-in-chief. The Village of Andrushi in Pereyaslav District. Historical and Ethnographic Essay. Kyiv, 2016, 256 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  24. SOROKOVA, Sofiya. The Swallows do not Fly to Zarubyntsi: Historical and Local History Essay/ NAHAIKO, Taras, Oleh HORBOVYI, editors-compilers. Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi, 2015, 368 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  25. The Flooded Settlements of the Kyivan Sea have been Honoured in Vyshhorod [viewed February 29, 2020]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMk5m0BmG6I [in Ukrainian].
  26. FEDOROVYCH, Nadiya. The Village of Andrushi in the Handwritten Heritage of Dmytro Kosaryk – Ukrainian Writer, Literary Critic and Ethnographer. In: SKRYPNYK, Hanna, editor-in-chief. The Village of Andrushi in Pereyaslav District. Historical and Ethnographic Essay. Kyiv, 2016, pp. 9–16 [in Ukrainian].
  27. KHALIUK, Lesia. Oral Folk Narratives of Ukrainians-Resettlers from Lemkivshchyna, Kholmshchyna, Pidliashshia and Nadsiannia: Genre-Thematic Peculiarities, Artistic Features. Kyiv, 2013, 202 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  28. BARTMIŃSKI, Jerzy. Home– a Universal and Culture-Specific Concept. In: Jerzy BARTMIŃSKI, ed. The Axiological Lexicon of Slavs and Their Neighbours. The Concept of HOME. Lublin, 2018, vol. 1, pp. 16–41 [in English].
  29. DYCZOK, Marta. The Grand Alliance and Ukrainian Refugees. Oxford, 2000, 277 pp. [in English].
  30. GODYŃ, Maria. Opowieść o utraconej wsi Maniowy. Studium z antropologii pamięci. Kraków, 2015, 168 pp. [in Polish].
  31. PRYMAKA-ONISZK, Aneta. Bieżeństwo 1915. Zapomniani uchodźcy. Wołowiec, 2017, 368pp. [in Polish].
  32. WYLEGAŁA, Anna. Prszesiedlenia a pamięć. Studium (nie)pamięci społecznej na prszykładzie ukraińskiej Galicji i polskich “Ziem odzyskanych”. Toruń, 2014, 509pp. [in Polish].