Back to the journal

Landscape as a mirror of memories: modern memorial practices of the Dnieper people in the context of postcolonial studies (According to field materials)

Read the articleRead the articleDownload the article
The authors of the publication:
Bosa Liubov
Bibliographic description:
Bosa, L. (2021) Landscape as a mirror of memories: modern memorial practices of the Dnieper people in the context of postcolonial studies (According to field materials). Folk Art and Ethnology, 4 (392), 17–27.


Bosa Liubov

a Ph.D. in History, a senior researcher at the NASU M. Rylskyi IASFE Ukrainian Ethnological Centre Department


Landscape as a mirror of memories: modern memorial practicesof the Dnieper people in the context of postcolonial studies (According to field materials)



With the growth of modern globalization trends, researchers are increasingly focusing on the ecological and spatial features of national cultures. In the 20th century as a result of unbalanced environmental policy in the USSR, the basic principles of human-landscape interaction were violated. Particularly, in Ukraine, as a result of the construction of a cascade of hydroelectric power plants, the traditional riverside landscape of the Dnieper was destroyed, the relict lands of which until recently formed an integral natural and cultural (associative, historical, toponymic, ecological) system. Our expeditionary researching made it possible to highlight the special role of the former landscape of the River (as a “mirror of memory”) in the collective perceptions of the local population and Ukrainians in general. Emphasis has also been focused on the intensification of informal “memorial communities” in recent years, which have been active in consolidating the descendants of displaced people from floodplains. Most of these actions are ritual and memorial ones those manifest the grief and efforts of forced relocating persons to pass on to their descendants the memory of their lost small homeland. Spontaneous memorialization, beginning as a traditional funeral ritual, a natural and cultural instruction of local communities to commemorating (mutual memory), takes the form of protest social action in a time of new challenges for society, consciously protecting the national space. To interpret the obtained materials (own ethnographic monitoring, interviews, mass-media materials, social networks, visual documents) methods of situational analysis and performativity of culture (the ritual) were used to determine the dispositions “dominance – subordination”, “center” – “periphery”, “memory” – “amnesia”, “structures of othering”, “resistance”, etc as a way of legitimizing “grassroots voices” and analysis of power practices.



cultural landscape, Dnipro, memorial practices, spontaneous memorialization, postcolonial studies.



  1. BABENKO, Oleh, PETRENKO, Ivan. Our sea is new... Pages of the history of construction of Kremenchug hydroelectric power station. Kropyvnytskyi, 2016. 380 p. [in Ukrainian].
  2. BOSA, Liubov. Changes in the landscape of the Dnieper in the twentieth century as a socio-cultural problem. Folk art and ethnology, 2012, vol. 4, pp. 53–63 [in Ukrainian].
  3. BIDNOSHYIA, Iurii. Relocated both the living and the dead. «2000» 10–16.0.2004 [in Ukrainian].
  4. BILIVNENKO, Serhii. Peasant-steppe dweller and river element of the Dnieper: based on historical and ethnographic expeditions of the Iakiv Novitskyi Zaporizhzhia Scientific Society. Folk art and ethnology, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 12–17 [in Ukrainian].
  5. BULANOVA,Nataliia. Cossack settlement Trituzne: lost landscapes and historical memory. Folk art and ethnology, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 58–62 [in Ukrainian].
  6. HRYMYCH, Maryna. Anthropology of space. Vol. 1. Cultural landscape of Kyiv and its environs / еd. by M. Hrymych. Kyiv, 2017. 316 p. [in Ukrainian].
  7. HUDCHENKO, Zoia. A village in the lower reaches of the Dnieper. Folk art and ethnology, 2007, no 2, pp. 91–100 [in Ukrainian].
  8. European Landscape Convention of 20.10.2000. URL: (accessed 10 March 2021) [in Ukrainian].
  9. OLENENKO, Anna. “Our new sea – our new grief”: The conflict between the Ukrainian and Soviet in the struggle for the construction of the landscape of the Lower Dnieper. Ab Imperio, 2019, vol. 1, pp. 125–152 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Kaniv PSP: The burden of the Soviet past or an urgent need? URL: (accessed 10 May 2021) [in Ukrainian].
  11. KOVAL-FUCHYLO, Iryna. Parental home and new place of residence: understanding of forced resettlement in 1959–1960 in Ukraine. Mythology and folklore. 2013, no 4, pp. 14–19 [in Ukrainian].
  12. KUKHARENKO, Svitlana. Roadside monuments: a modern phenomenon, or longevity of folk traditions. Ethnology notebooks, 2010, no 3–4, pp. 371–377 [in Ukrainian].
  13. MANIUK,Vadym. Model of the ecological network for the Steppe Dnieper: approaches to design. Globalization processes in nature resource management. Kyiv, 2008 [in Ukrainian].
  14. The village of Andrushi. Historical and ethnographic essay / [ed. By Skrypnyk H.; NAS Ukraine, M. T. Rylskyi IAFE . Kyiv, 2016. 256 p. [in Ukrainian].
  15. FOX, C. A, MAGILLIGAN F. J, SNEDDON C. S. “You kill the dam, you are killing a part of me”: dam removal and the environmental politics of river restoration. Geoforum, 2016 (3), 93–104.
  16. FOX, C. A., REO, N. J., TURNER, D. A. et al. “The river is us; the river is in our veins”: re‑defining river restoration in three Indigenous communities. Sustain Sci. 2017 (12), 521–533.
  17. CYBRIWSKY R. Along Ukraine’s River: A Social and Environmental History of the Dnipro. Budapest, 2018. 280 pp.
  18. KOŁODZIEJCZYK, D., ŞANDRU C. Introduction: On colonialism, communism and east-central Europe–some reflections. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 48 (2), 113–116.
  19. Spontaneous Shrines and the Public Memorialization of Death / ed. by J. Santino. New York, 2011.
  20. TURNER, V. The Anthropology of Performance. New York : PAJ Publications, 1988.


The texts are available under the terms of the Creative Commons
international license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0