Review

1Article’s titleType name of the article
2Article’s sizeThe number of pages, figures, tables, sources
3Article’s devotedDescribe the topic of the article
4Article’s topicalityEstimate level of relevance as
High
Satisfactory
Low
5Conformity to the profile of the editionArticle fits to the edition’s profile
Article does not fit to the edition’s profile
6Scientific noveltyEstimate scientific novelty level as
High
Satisfactory
Low
7Research’s objective and conceptEstimate of the level of the substantiation of the article’s purpose and its concept as
High
Satisfactory
Low
8Scientific valueEvaluate of the level of scientific value of the reviewed article as
High
Satisfactory
Low
9Article’s s tructureArticle is structured according to the established requirements
Article structure does not meet the established requirements
10The basic results of the researches (generalisation of historiographic and source base, results definition, theoretical and practical importance, correctness of the use of the conceptual-categorial terms, conclusion):Estimate the completeness of generalisation of the historiographic and source base, statement of results, theoretical and practical importance, correctness of using the notional-categoric apparatus, and formulation of conclusions
11Use of literary sourcesEvaluate the completeness of the review and its relevance to the current state of the scientific problem. Correspondence of the content of the text of the article as
High
Satisfactory
Low
12Linguo-stylistic levelEstimate the stylistic and grammatical quality of the reviewed material as
High
Satisfactory
Low
13Arrangment quality:Estimate the quality of arrangement of the material as
High
Satisfactory
Low
14The reader’s recommendationsIt is recommended for publication
It is recommended for publication after amend
It is not recommended for publication due to …
Recommendations:
15The additional comment of the reviewer 
16Information about the reviewer / readerSurname, first and patronymic names
Scientific degree
Academic status
Work place
Emaіl address
The article has been received by the reader on
2019 р.
The review has been written on
2019 р.
Surname, first name, patronymic name
the reader’s signature